Source avec lien : Annals of Global Health, 85(1), 2019. 10.5334/aogh.2461
CONTEXTE : Les travailleurs de la santé, qu’ils disposent de ressources ou de revenus limités, sont confrontés à des menaces pour leur santé en raison des expositions rencontrées dans leur environnement de travail unique et complexe. Même avant l’épidémie d’Ebola de 2014, les travailleurs de la santé subissaient régulièrement des préjudices évitables, notamment en raison de la collusion fatale entre l’épidémie de VIH/sida et l’infection de tuberculose (TB) dans les pays à forte endémie. OBJECTIFS : L’objectif de ce document est d’examiner les analyses du personnel du secteur de la santé par les agences de développement et de santé publique concernant sa durabilité, les menaces des risques pour la santé personnelle des travailleurs et les discussions sur les protections pour faire face à ces risques.
BACKGROUND: Health workers in both well-resourced and limited income settings face health threats from exposures encountered in their unique and complex work environment. Even before the 2014 Ebola outbreak, preventable harm was routinely felt by health workers, most visibly through the fatal collusion between the HIV/AIDS epidemic and tuberculosis (TB) infection in high endemic countries. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to examine the analyses of the health sector workforce by development and public health agencies regarding its sustainability, threats from workers’ personal health risks and discussion of protections to address those risks. METHODS: Development and public health agency reports assessing the sustainability of and threats to the health workforce both pre-and post the 2014 Ebola outbreak were examined with a focus on low and middle- income countries (LMICs). FINDINGS: Reviews of the health sector workforce have largely focused on its role as a necessary component of sustainable development. Hence, staff competency, numbers and productivity have been emphasized with little notice of the conditions of work and the highly hazardous environment contributing to worker out-migration, illness and death. CONCLUSIONS: Going forward, the 2016 World Health Assembly campaign to advance human resources for health and other UN efforts on health employment may offer some opportunities to address needed health worker protections. However, to these largely competency-focused workforce development efforts must first be brought resources for and commitment to protecting the safety of these workers’ lives and livelihood. Doing less defeats investments in fragile health systems and is plainly unethical.