Source avec lien : Journal of Patient Safety, 18(2). 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000812
Les secondes victimes sont définies comme des travailleurs de la santé impliqués dans un événement indésirable imprévu pour un patient, qui ont éprouvé une détresse professionnelle et psychologique. Le Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) est une enquête développée et validée aux Etats-Unis, qui décrit l’expérience des secondes victimes. Cette étude vise à réaliser l’adaptation transculturelle du SVEST et à évaluer ses caractéristiques psychométriques dans le contexte italien.
Objective Second victims are defined as healthcare workers involved in an unanticipated adverse patient event, who experienced professional and psychological distress. The Second Victim Experience and Support Tool (SVEST) is a survey developed and validated in the United States, which describes the experience of second victims. This study aims to perform the cross-cultural adaptation of the SVEST and to evaluate its psychometric characteristics in the Italian context. Methods Translation and cross-cultural adaptation process was performed according to the World Health Organization guidelines. Then, 349 healthcare workers, including nurses, doctors, residents, and technicians, involved in direct patient care—a potential second victim—completed the Italian version of SVEST in a validation survey at the Academic Hospital of Udine. The SVEST consists of 29 items, divided into 7 dimensions, 2 outcome variables, and 7 support options. The Italian version was assessed for internal consistency through Cronbach α, for content validity with content validity index for scales and for item and for construct validity with Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Results The internal consistency of the instrument was adequate in its overall evaluation with Cronbach α value of 0.88 (95% confidence interval = 0.86). The content validity index for scales was 0.94 and that for item was 0.70. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed a good model fit for the 9-factor structure (χ2 = 676.18, df = 327, P < 0.001). Root mean squared error of approximation, Akaike information criterion, and comparative fix index Tucker-Lewis index values also suggested a good fit to the data. Conclusions The Italian version of the SVEST can be used to evaluate second victim experiences, demonstrating adequate validity, reliability, and good psychometric properties. Consultez la page de l’article