Emotional contagion as a trigger for moral disengagement: Their effects on workplace injuries

Source avec lien : Safety Science, 140, . 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105317

L’objectif de cette étude était de tester empiriquement la proposition selon laquelle la contagion des émotions déclenche un désengagement moral et une augmentation ultérieure des accidents du travail. En utilisant les théories de la contagion émotionnelle et de la cognition sociale, nous avons testé la proposition selon laquelle une contagion élevée de la colère (c’est-à-dire une émotion négative qui interfère avec le fonctionnement mental et permet un comportement inapproprié) déclencherait des justifications morales pour les violations de la sécurité, tandis qu’une contagion élevée de la joie (c’est-à-dire une émotion positive accompagnée d’une condition de fonctionnement optimale et d’une activité constructive) empêcherait le désengagement moral lié à la sécurité. À son tour, le désengagement moral était censé être lié à des taux plus élevés d’accidents du travail ultérieurs.

The purpose of this study was to empirically test the proposition that contagion of emotions triggers moral disengagement and subsequent increases in work-related injuries. Using emotional contagion and social cognitive theories, we tested the proposition that higher contagion of anger (i.e., a negative emotion that interferes with mental functioning and enables inappropriate behavior) would trigger moral justifications for safety violations, whereas higher contagion of joy (i.e., a positive emotion accompanied by an optimal operating condition and constructive activity) would prevent safety-related moral disengagement. In turn, moral disengagement was predicted to be related to higher rates of subsequent workplace injuries. Using a cross-country and multi-method (i.e., cross-lagged, cross-sectional) design, data from 503 employees in the U.S. (two-wave) and 538 employees in Italy (cross-sectional) supported the hypothesized mediation model. Specifically, both in the U.S. and Italy, emotional contagion of anger positively predicted moral disengagement, whereas emotional contagion of joy negatively predicted moral disengagement. Furthermore, moral disengagement positively predicted experienced injuries and partially mediated the relationship between contagion of joy/anger and injuries. These findings suggest that moral justifications of safety violations, and related injuries, may be prevented by exchanges of positive emotions (and triggered by exchanges of negative emotions) that employees absorb during social interactions at work. Theoretical and practical implications for organizational ethics are discussed in light of the globally increasing emotional pressure and concerns for a safe and psychologically healthy environment in today’s workplace, particularly given the recent pandemic spread of Coronavirus disease (CoVid-19).

Consultez la page de l’article

Laisser un commentaire