Attitude to safety rules and reflexivity as determinants of safety climate

Source avec lien : Journal of Safety Research, 71, 2019/11/14. 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.016

Cet article présente deux études qui se concentrent sur la relation entre les règles de sécurité et le climat de sécurité. On s’attend à ce qu’une acceptation raisonnée, c’est-à-dire fondée sur une compréhension des bases des règles et une gestion collective des règles, soit bénéfique pour le climat.

Introduction We present two studies that focus on the relationship between safety rules and the safety climate. It is expected that a reasoned acceptance, namely one based on an understanding of the bases for the rules and a collective management of the rules, should benefit the climate. Method In an initial study (N = 202) employees replied to a questionnaire that measured the safety climate, the level of the relationship with the safety rules, and the understanding of their bases. The results highlighted the fact that a reasoned acceptance of the rules is associated with an understanding of their bases and predicts the level of safety. In a second study (N = 258) employees replied to a questionnaire measuring team reflexivity, the safety climate, and the level of relationship with the safety rules. We observed that collective management of the rules mediated the relation between team reflexivity and the safety climate. Results The results are discussed from the point of view of their practical implications. Developing safety climate requires that operators are trained to understand the basis of safety rules and team reflexivity.

Consultez la page de l’article

Laisser un commentaire