A Scoping Review of Validated Tools to Measure Incivility in Healthcare Settings

Source avec lien : JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(9), Sep-19. 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000783

L’incivilité au sein de la main-d’œuvre est associée à des résultats de piètre qualité, à une augmentation du roulement du personnel et à une diminution de la satisfaction au travail. Des outils validés sont essentiels pour mesurer avec précision l’incivilité. Le but de cette étude était de comparer les caractéristiques d’outils validés pour une utilisation dans un environnement clinique chargé.

OBJECTIVE To identify and compare validated tools used to assess incivility in healthcare settings. BACKGROUND Incivility in the workforce is associated with poor quality outcomes, increased employee turnover, and decreased job satisfaction. Validated tools are essential for accurate measurement of incivility. The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of validated tools for use in a busy clinical setting. METHODS In a scoping review, English language research studies using incivility tools published in PubMed or CINAHL between March 1, 2013, and March 14, 2018, were assessed for sound psychometric properties and feasibility of use (eg, short, easy to administer). RESULTS After screening 869 articles and full text review of 244, 5 identified tools met the criteria; the Short Negative Acts Questionnaire seemed best suited for use in a busy healthcare setting. CONCLUSION Adoption of a standardized and validated incivility tool makes it possible to compare across clinical settings and track progress over time.

Consultez la page de l’article

Laisser un commentaire