Patterns and trends in OSHA occupational noise exposure measurements from 1979 to 2013

Source avec lien : Occup Environ Med, Prépublication, 11/26/2018. 10.1136/oemed-2018-105041

Le bruit est l’une des expositions les plus courantes et la perte d’audition d’origine professionnelle est fortement répandue. Le bruit est également lié à de nombreux effets non auditifs sur la santé. L’objectif de cette étude était de décrire et d’analyser les mesures de bruit personnelles disponibles via la base de données Integrated Management Information System de l’OSHA, en identifiant les industries présentant des niveaux de bruit élevés ou les tendances à la hausse de l’exposition des travailleurs dans le temps.

Objectives Noise is one of the most common exposures, and occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is highly prevalent. In addition to NIHL, noise is linked to numerous non-auditory health effects. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) maintains the Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) database of compliance-related measurements performed in various industries across the USA. The goal of the current study was to describe and analyse personal noise measurements available through the OSHA IMIS, identifying industries with elevated personal noise levels or increasing trends in worker exposure over time. Methods Through a Freedom of Information Act request, we obtained OSHA’s noise measurements collected and stored in IMIS between 1979 and 2013 and analysed permissible exposure limit (PEL) and action level (AL) criteria measurements by two-digit industry code. Results The manufacturing industry represented 87.8% of the 93 920 PEL measurements and 84.6% of the 58 073 AL measurements. The highest mean noise levels were found among the agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry for PEL (93.1 dBA) and the mining, quarrying and oil and gas extraction group for AL (93.3 dBA). Overall, measurements generally showed a decreasing trend in noise levels and exceedances of AL and PEL by year, although this was not true for all industries. Conclusions Our results suggest that, despite reductions in noise over time, further noise control interventions are warranted both inside and outside of the manufacturing industry. Further reductions in occupational noise exposures across many industries are necessary to continue to reduce the risk of occupational NIHL.

Consultez la page de l’article

Laisser un commentaire